Heslop

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEENAN WILKINS, No. 2:20-cv-1622 DJC SCR P Plaintiff, v. ORDER S. HESLOP, et al., Defendants.

17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, proceeds pro se with claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for excessive force, retaliation, and equal protection. Plaintiff also asserts state law claims. Plaintiff’s third motion to compel discovery is before the court. (ECF No. 77.) For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part. I. Background and Plaintiff’s Allegations At all relevant times, plaintiff was an inmate at California Health Care Facility. (ECF No. 20 at 1.) He alleges defendant Heslop used excessive force on January 17, 2019, and then issued plaintiff a false disciplinary report. (Id. at 3, 7.) On a class of one theory, he also alleges his equal protection rights were violated at the disciplinary hearing on January 25, 2019. (Id.) This case proceeds on the following claims: (1) against…