Warden

(HC) Bailey v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20242:23-cv-01087California405 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRANT EUGENE BAILEY, No. 2:23-cv-01087-KJM-EFB (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER WARDEN, FCI HERLONG, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a notice of appeal of this court's August 26, 2024 denial of his application for a writ of habeas corpus. Before petitioner can appeal this decision, a certificate of appealability must issue. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). A certificate of appealability may issue under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 “only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). The court must either issue a certificate of appealability indicating which issues satisfy the required showing or must state the reasons why such a certificate should not issue. Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). For the reasons set forth in the magistrate judge’s April 24, 2024 order and June 17, 2024 findings and recommendations and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.