Cameron

(PC) Taylor v. Cameron

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20242:23-cv-02353California949 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SHAUNTAE TAYLOR, Case No. 2:23-cv-2353-WBS-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS N. CAMERON, et al., Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff Shauntae Taylor, a state prisoner, filed this action alleging that defendants Abarca, Benavidez, and Cameron violated his First and Fourteenth Amendment rights. ECF No. 12. Defendants have filed a motion to revoke plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status, arguing that he has accumulated at least three strikes. ECF No. 28. Plaintiff has filed an opposition, ECF No. 35, and defendants have filed a reply, ECF No. 38. I recommend that defendants’ motion be granted. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), a prisoner plaintiff may not proceed in forma pauperis if he has filed three or more cases that have been dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Such “three-strikers” must pay the filing fee unless they allege that they are in imminent physical danger. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.