(PS) Ramos Rodriguez v. Mejia Torres

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20242:24-cv-01025California681 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 J. JESUS RAMOS RODRIGUEZ, No. 2:24-cv-1025-DC-SCR Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS MARIA XOCHITL MEJIA TORRES, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff J. Jesus Ramos Rodriguez is proceeding pro se in this action, which was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On April 4, 2024, Plaintiff filed a complaint and paid the filing fee. ECF No. 1. On April 18, 2024, one of the Defendants filed a pro se Answer. ECF No. 4. On April 24, 2024, Magistrate Judge Barnes issued an Order to Show Cause why the action should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. ECF No. 5. Plaintiff failed to respond to the Order to Show Cause. On August 6, 2024, this matter was reassigned to the undersigned. ECF No. 6. On October 30, 2024, this Court issued another Order to Show Cause (“OSC”). ECF No. 8. The OSC directed Plaintiff to show cause within 14 days why the action should…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.