Unit 53, Inc. v. Run Roadlines, Inc
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 UNIT 53, INC., Case No. 2:24-cv-01718-DJC-CSK Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO COMPEL
RUN ROADLINES,INC., et al., (ECF No. 25) Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Unit 53, Inc. moves to compel Defendants Run Roadlines, Inc., Manpreet 18 Randhawa, and 3515 Hwy 99, LLC to serve their initial disclosures and to respond to 19 Plaintiff’s interrogatories, requests for production, and requests for admission.1 (ECF No. 20 25). Plaintiff also seeks reasonable expenses, including attorneys’ fees, for having to file 21 the motions to compel. Pl. Mot. Compel (ECF No. 25-1 at 8-9). Pursuant to Local Rule 22 251(e), Plaintiff’s motion is excepted from the requirement for Joint Statements re 23 Discovery Disagreement and was set for hearing on December 17, 2024. See E.D. Cal. 24 L.R. 251(e); Pl. Mot Compel at 5-6. Though Defendants’ response to the motion to 25 compel was due December 10, 2024, Defendants never responded to Plaintiff’s motion. 26 27 This matter…