Ravinder Singh v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 23, 202420-72059California1,129 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 23 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAVINDER SINGH, No. 20-72059

Petitioner, Agency No. A215-814-672

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 19, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: GOULD, SUNG, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Ravinder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions pro se for review of a

Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his motion to reopen removal

proceedings. The IJ ordered Petitioner removed in absentia after he failed to

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). appear at a master calendar hearing on November 27, 2018. Petitioner seeks to

reopen his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.