Damaris Guifarro-Aceituno v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 23, 202420-72976California613 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 23 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAMARIS GABRIELA GUIFARRO- No. 20-72976

ACEITUNO,

Agency No. A206-475-687 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 19, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: GOULD, SUNG, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Damaris Gabriela Guifarro-Aceituno, a native and citizen of Honduras

petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order

denying her motions to reopen removal proceedings and to reconsider the BIA’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). prior decision dismissing her appeal of an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of a

previous motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.