Jesus Abalos v. C. Parham

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 23, 202422-16250California1,215 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 23 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JESUS ABALOS, No. 22-16250

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-01699-JAM-KJN v.

C. PARHAM, Correctional Officer, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California John A. Mendez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 19, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: GOULD, SUNG, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff, Jesus Abalos, appeals pro se from the district court’s grant of

summary judgment to Defendant C. Parham 1 in his civil rights action alleging that

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 The district court previously dismissed Defendants J. Scheurer and Joe Lizarraga from the action. Parham used excessive force against Abalos while…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.