Jesus Abalos v. C. Parham
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 23, 202422-16250California1,215 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 23 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JESUS ABALOS, No. 22-16250
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-01699-JAM-KJN v.
C. PARHAM, Correctional Officer, MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California John A. Mendez, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 19, 2024** San Francisco, California
Before: GOULD, SUNG, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiff, Jesus Abalos, appeals pro se from the district court’s grant of
summary judgment to Defendant C. Parham 1 in his civil rights action alleging that
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 The district court previously dismissed Defendants J. Scheurer and Joe Lizarraga from the action. Parham used excessive force against Abalos while…