Bruce Senator v. Kathleen Allison
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 23, 202422-15681California638 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 23 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BRUCE RICHARD SENATOR, No. 22-15681
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:22-cv-00144-JLT-BAK v.
KATHLEEN ALLISON; JOSEPH BICK; T. MEMORANDUM*
CISNEROS; KEITH WRIGHT; K.
WILLIAMS; J. HEBERLE; S. HTAY;
NRURIKA NOU; ELEANOR GRIFFITH;
DAVID OBERST,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Jennifer L. Thurston, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 19, 2024** San Francisco, California
Before: GOULD, SUNG, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.
Bruce Senator appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to
proceed in forma pauperis. The district court denied Senator’s motion because he
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). had three “strikes” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and failed to…