Bruce Senator v. Kathleen Allison

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 23, 202422-15681California638 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 23 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRUCE RICHARD SENATOR, No. 22-15681

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:22-cv-00144-JLT-BAK v.

KATHLEEN ALLISON; JOSEPH BICK; T. MEMORANDUM*

CISNEROS; KEITH WRIGHT; K.

WILLIAMS; J. HEBERLE; S. HTAY;

NRURIKA NOU; ELEANOR GRIFFITH;

DAVID OBERST,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Jennifer L. Thurston, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 19, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: GOULD, SUNG, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Bruce Senator appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to

proceed in forma pauperis. The district court denied Senator’s motion because he

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). had three “strikes” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and failed to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.