Perrot

I. BACKGROUND

A. In June 2004, a Humboldt County jury convicted Perrot of two counts of forcible rape; three counts of committing a lewd or lascivious act on a child of 14 or 15 years of age; five counts of unlawful sexual intercourse (statutory rape); one count of distribution of lewd material to a minor; and one count of committing a forcible lewd act (oral copulation) on a child. (People v. Perrot (May 17, 2006, A107378) [nonpub. opn.] (Perrot I).) Our 2006 opinion affirming these convictions summarized the evidence against Perrot as follows. “[Perrot]’s convictions stem from a series of sexual acts with two minor victims, B.H. and J.J. B.H. was 16 at the time the charged offenses took place; J.J. was 14.” (Perrot I, supra, A107378.) “B.H. met [Perrot] while attending drag races in the summer of 2002. She had consensual sexual intercourse with him on several occasions in the weeks that followed. . . . [Perrot] also showed B.H. child pornography on his computer.” (Ibid.) “J.J. also met [Perrot] in the summer of 2002 at street races. At some point while he and B.H. were having intercourse, [Perrot] asked her whether she could introduce him to younger girls. B.H. ignored…