Bare

Bare v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 23, 202423-452California431 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

DEC 23 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IBRAHIM FARHAB BARE, No. 23-452 Agency No. Petitioner, A073-436-746 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted December 2, 2024 San Francisco, California

Before: BENNETT, BRESS, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Ibrahim Farhab Bare petitions for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) denial of his motion to reopen removal proceedings to

consider his claim for deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture

(CAT). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we grant the petition and

remand.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. We review the denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion. Aguilar

Fermin v. Barr, 958 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir. 2020). Although the BIA “does not

have to write an exegesis on every contention,”…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.