Luehring
Luehring v. County of Los Angeles
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 23, 202423-1521California372 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 23 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FREDERICK LUEHRING, No. 23-1521 D.C. No. 2:21-cv-01426-GW-SHK Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. MEMORANDUM*
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; DETAIL
2601; LOS ANGELES OFFICE OF THE
DISTRICT ATTORNEY; DOES; LOS
ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S
DEPARTMENT; LOHNNIE DAY; ADAM
STROLL; TIM HOUSER; BRIAN
BANKS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California George H. Wu, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 17, 2024**
Before: WALLACE, GRABER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Frederick Luehring appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action arising out of an arrest. We have
jurisdiction…