Luehring

Luehring v. County of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 23, 202423-1521California372 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 23 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FREDERICK LUEHRING, No. 23-1521 D.C. No. 2:21-cv-01426-GW-SHK Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; DETAIL

2601; LOS ANGELES OFFICE OF THE

DISTRICT ATTORNEY; DOES; LOS

ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S

DEPARTMENT; LOHNNIE DAY; ADAM

STROLL; TIM HOUSER; BRIAN

BANKS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California George H. Wu, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 17, 2024**

Before: WALLACE, GRABER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Frederick Luehring appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action arising out of an arrest. We have

jurisdiction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.