County of Clark v. Orbitz Worldwide, LLC

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 23, 202424-688California1,772 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 23 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

COUNTY OF CLARK, No. 24-688 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:21-cv-01328-JCM-VCF v.

MEMORANDUM*

ORBITZ WORLDWIDE, LLC; et al.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada James C. Mahan, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 3, 2024 San Francisco, California

Before: BENNETT, BRESS, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Appellant County of Clark, Nevada (“County”) sued Appellees, various web-

based hotel booking companies or online travel companies (“OTCs”), seeking to

recover allegedly owed transient lodging taxes. The district court granted summary

judgment for the OTCs. The County appeals, challenging the district court’s

(1) refusal to remand the case to state court, (2) grant of summary judgment,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. (3) denial of the motion for reconsideration under Federal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.