Tatyana Drevaleva v. Doris Ng
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 23 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TATYANA EVGENIEVNA DREVALEVA, No. 22-16737
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-01984-EMC
v.
MEMORANDUM *
DORIS NG, in both her official and individual capacities as an Attorney of the California Department of Industrial Relations; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward M. Chen, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 17, 2024**
Before: WALLACE, GRABER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
Tatyana Evgenievna Drevaleva appeals pro se from the district court’s
judgment dismissing her action alleging federal and state law claims. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under Federal
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).…