Tatyana Drevaleva v. Doris Ng

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 23, 202422-16737California374 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 23 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TATYANA EVGENIEVNA DREVALEVA, No. 22-16737

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-01984-EMC

v.

MEMORANDUM *

DORIS NG, in both her official and individual capacities as an Attorney of the California Department of Industrial Relations; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward M. Chen, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 17, 2024**

Before: WALLACE, GRABER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Tatyana Evgenievna Drevaleva appeals pro se from the district court’s

judgment dismissing her action alleging federal and state law claims. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under Federal

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.