Omnitracs, LLC v. Platform Science, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 23, 20243:20-cv-00958California5,320 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 OMNITRACS, LLC AND XRS Case No.: 20-cv-958-CAB-DDL

CORPORATION,

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

Plaintiffs,

FOR RENEWED JMOL OR NEW

v.

TRIAL

PLATFORM SCIENCE, INC.,

12 [Doc. No. 605] Defendant.

14 I. Background At trial, Plaintiffs Omnitracs, LLC and XRS Corporation (jointly Omnitracs) alleged that defendant Platform Science, Inc. infringed various claims of four patents in this litigation: U.S. Patent No. 6,925,308 claims 1 and 5; U.S. Patent No. 9,262,934 claim 23; U.S. Patent No. 10,255,575 claims 1 and 11; and U.S. Patent No. 8,626,568 claims 11 and 23. [Doc. No. 513.] Before the case went to the jury, Omnitracs moved for Judgment as a Matter of Law (JMOL), pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 50(a), on its allegations of direct and indirect infringement of each of the asserted claims, a finding of willful infringement of each asserted claim, validity of the asserted claims,2 and its claims for lost profits and a reasonable royalty. [Doc. No. 557.]

26 1 Document numbers and page…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.