Omnitracs, LLC v. Platform Science, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 OMNITRACS, LLC AND XRS Case No.: 20-cv-958-CAB-DDL
CORPORATION,
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
Plaintiffs,
FOR RENEWED JMOL OR NEW
v.
TRIAL
PLATFORM SCIENCE, INC.,
12 [Doc. No. 605] Defendant.
14 I. Background At trial, Plaintiffs Omnitracs, LLC and XRS Corporation (jointly Omnitracs) alleged that defendant Platform Science, Inc. infringed various claims of four patents in this litigation: U.S. Patent No. 6,925,308 claims 1 and 5; U.S. Patent No. 9,262,934 claim 23; U.S. Patent No. 10,255,575 claims 1 and 11; and U.S. Patent No. 8,626,568 claims 11 and 23. [Doc. No. 513.] Before the case went to the jury, Omnitracs moved for Judgment as a Matter of Law (JMOL), pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 50(a), on its allegations of direct and indirect infringement of each of the asserted claims, a finding of willful infringement of each asserted claim, validity of the asserted claims,2 and its claims for lost profits and a reasonable royalty. [Doc. No. 557.]
26 1 Document numbers and page…