Zimmerman

Zimmerman v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 23, 20243:19-cv-01318California1,956 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COREY Z., Case No.: 19-cv-1318-MMP

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of

Social Security, [ECF No. 29] Defendant. 16 17 Pending before the Court is a Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), in which Plaintiff’s counsel requests an award of fees for representing Corey Z. (“Plaintiff”) in connection with this Social Security appeal. [ECF No. 29.] The Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant”) filed a response indicating it neither supports nor opposes the motion. [ECF No. 32.] Though Plaintiff was served with the pending motion and notified of the opportunity to respond, he did not file an objection. [See ECF No. 29 at 2; ECF No. 29-1 at 18.] The parties have consented to the undersigned

26 1 In accordance with Civil Local Rule 7.1(e)(6)(b), the Court refers to all…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.