Omnitracs, LLC v. Platform Science, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 23, 20243:20-cv-00958California2,950 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 OMNITRACS, LLC AND XRS Case No.: 20-cv-958-CAB-DDL

CORPORATION,

ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S

Plaintiffs,

MOTION FOR RENEWED JMOL

v.

OR NEW TRIAL

PLATFORM SCIENCE, INC.,

12 [Doc. No. 604, 606] Defendant.

14 I. Background At trial, Plaintiffs Omnitracs, LLC and XRS Corporation (jointly Omnitracs) alleged that defendant Platform Science, Inc. infringed various claims of four patents in this litigation: U.S. Patent No. 6,925,308 claims 1 and 5; U.S. Patent No. 9,262,934 claim 23; U.S. Patent No. 10,255,575 claims 1 and 11; and U.S. Patent No. 8,626,568 claims 11 and 23. [Doc. No. 513.] Before the case went to the jury, Platform Science moved for Judgment as a Matter of Law (JMOL), pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 50(a), on the allegations of direct and indirect infringement of each of the asserted claims, willful infringement of each asserted claim, and Omnitracs’ claims for lost profits and a reasonable royalty. [Doc. No. 555.] 25 26 27 28 The Court granted Platform Science’s motion for a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.