Sivak

Sivak v. Perea

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 23, 20243:24-cv-03012California784 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LACEY SIVAK,

Case No. 24-cv-01038-AMO (PR) Plaintiff, 24-cv-02333-AMO (PR) 9 v. 24-cv-02334-AMO (PR) 24-cv-03012-AMO (PR) ZAHIDA PEREA, 24-cv-03017-AMO (PR) 11 Defendant. ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Lacey Sivak, an Idaho state prisoner and frequent litigant, filed the above-captioned actions, representing himself. In each case, the Court denied Sivak’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)1 because he has had three or more prior dismissals, has failed to allege any specific imminent danger of serious physical injury at the time he filed the action, and did not meet the standard for proceeding without payment of filing fees as a “three-striker” who has had many prior lawsuits dismissed as frivolous. See Ray v. Lara, 31 F.4th 692,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.