Herbst

Bravo Acevedo v. Herbst

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 23, 20241:24-cv-00125California1,419 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARIA CONSUELO BRAVO ACEVEDO, ) Case No.: 1:24-cv-0125 JLT SKO ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER DISMISSING THE ACTION WITHOUT ) PREJUDICE FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO v. ) PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO COMPLY ) WITH THE COURT’S ORDER KAWEAH HEALTH, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) )

Maria Consuelo Bravo Acevedo seeks to hold the defendants liable for violations of her constitutional rights. (See generally Doc. 11.) Because Plaintiff failed to prosecute the action and failed to comply with the Court’s order to file an amended complaint, the action is DISMISSED without prejudice. I. Relevant Background Kaweah Health moved to dismiss Plaintiff’s amended complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 18.) The Court found the allegations in the complaint were “vague and conclusory,” and Plaintiff failed “to identify what each named defendant did that lead to the deprivation of [her] constitutional rights.” (Doc. 24…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.