Homyk
Homyk v. ChemoCentryx, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JONNIE HOMYK, et al., Case No. 21-cv-03343-JST
Plaintiffs,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
v. RELIEF FROM NON-DISPOSITIVE
ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE
CHEMOCENTRYX, INC., et al., Re: ECF No. 165 Defendants.
12 Before the Court is Defendants ChemoCentryx, Inc. and Thomas J. Schall’s motion for relief from a non-dispositive pretrial order of a magistrate judge. ECF No. 165. Defendants ask the Court to set aside Judge Lisa J. Cisneros’s August 8, 2024 order (Dkt. 164, “Order”), which struck Defendants’ Supplemental Rule 26(a) disclosures of Glen Massie, Medpace, Inc., Christian Pagnoux, Ulrich Specks, and Dalia Rayes. The Court will deny the motion. I. LEGAL STANDARD “A non-dispositive order entered by a magistrate must be deferred to unless it is ‘clearly erroneous or contrary to law.’” Grimes v. City & Cty. of San Francisco, 951 F.2d 236, 241 (9th Cir. 1991) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A)). “A decision is…