Garrick
Garrick v. Garrick
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 OWEN GARRICK, Case No. 22-cv-04549-JST
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’
v. MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES
JOCELYN FREEMAN GARRICK, et al., Re: ECF No. 67 Defendants.
12 Before the Court is the motion for attorney’s fees filed by Defendants the County of Alameda, Alameda County Emergency Medical Services, the Alameda County Public Health Department, and Jocelyn Freeman Garrick in her official capacity (together “the County Defendants”). ECF No. 67. The Court will deny the motion without prejudice. I. BACKGROUND This case arises out of Plaintiff Owen Garrick’s civil rights complaint against the County Defendants. Garrick filed his First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on September 29, 2022. ECF No. 10. The County Defendants filed an anti-SLAPP motion to strike and motion to dismiss the FAC on November 2, 2022. ECF No. 20. On June 21, 2023, the Court granted in part and denied in part the County Defendants’ first motion to…