Ndizeye

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Daniel NDIZEYE, Case No.: 24-cv-0882-AGS-BLM

ORDER (1) DENYING MOTION TO

Plaintiff, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS v. (ECF 6), (2) DISMISSING ACTION, 6 (3) DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF MANDAMUS (ECF 9), AND Judge Carolyn CAIETTI, (4) DENYING MOTION FOR Defendant. EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION (ECF 7)

Plaintiff Daniel Ndizeye, proceeding without an attorney, is suing a state-court judge for denying a motion for her disqualification. He also requests to proceed in forma pauperis, that is, without paying the court’s filing fees. As explained below, his IFP application is denied because it does not provide sufficient detail. But even if his financial situation qualified him, his claim would not survive mandatory screening. DISCUSSION A. IFP Application 17 Parties instituting civil actions in United States…