Pando

Pando v. Santa Clara Valley Health and Hospital System

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 23, 20244:23-cv-06592California2,024 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 HENRY PANDO, Case No. 23-cv-06592-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v.

SANTA CLARA VALLEY HEALTH AND

HOSPITAL SYSTEM,

11 Defendant.

12 Plaintiff, an inmate housed at Santa Clara County Jail, filed this pro se action. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff’s second amended complaint (ECF No. 14) is now before the Court for review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DISMISSES the second amended complaint with prejudice. DISCUSSION I. Procedural History Plaintiff commenced this action by filing the complaint docketed at ECF No. 1. Plaintiff then filed an amended complaint docketed at ECF No. 11. The amended complaint alleged that Defendant Santa Clara Valley Health and Hospital System had “violated the Constitution by failing to respond reasonably or by providing adequate treatment to plaintiff’s known serious injury”; that his claim is detailed in his medical records; and that Defendant’s “failure to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.