BMO Bank N.A. v. Chahal Roadlines Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 23, 20241:24-cv-00788California1,260 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BMO HARRIS BANK, N.A., ) Case No.: 1:24-cv-0788 JLT HBK ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS IN PART, GRANTING v. ) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT ) JUDGMENT IN PART, AND DIRECTING THE CHAHAL ROADLINES, INC., et al., ) CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE ) Defendants. ) (Docs. 11, 15) )

BMO Harris Bank N.A. seeks to hold Chahal Roadlines, Inc. and Malkit Singh liable for breach of contract related to several Loan and Security Agreements. (See generally Doc. 1.) After Defendants failed to answer, the Court entered default against Defendants. (Doc. 9.) Plaintiff now seeks default judgment against Defendants. (Doc. 11.) The magistrate judge determined the Court has diversity jurisdiction over the claims presented and personal jurisdiction over Defendants. (Doc. 15 at 6-8.) The magistrate judge also found Plaintiff complied with the service requirements under Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil 24…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.