Yost

(PS) Halajian v. Yost

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 23, 20241:24-cv-00826California839 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BARRY STUART HALAJIAN, ) Case No.: 1:24-cv-0826 JLT SKO ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS GRANTING v. ) DEEFNDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS WITH ) LEAVE TO AMEND KELLY YOST, et al, ) ) (Docs. 5, 14, 20) Defendants. ) ) )

Barry Halajian is proceeding pro se in this action, in which he seeks to hold Kelly Yost and the City of Fresno liable for violations of federal and state laws, including violations of his civil rights, the Bill of Attainder, the Contracts Clause of the U.S. Constitution, negligent interference with a prospective economic advantage, and infliction of emotional distress. (See generally Doc. 1.) Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rules 8, 12(b)(1)(6), 12(e), 12(f) and 12(g) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 5.) The assigned magistrate judge noted Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion to dismiss was 24 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.