Block

Block v. Arsh & Jot LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 23, 20241:24-cv-00812California3,493 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HENDRIK BLOCK, Case No. 1:24-cv-0812 JLT SAB Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING IN PART THE

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

v. GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT,

ARSH & JOT LLC, DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S STATE LAW

CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND

Defendant. DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO

CLOSE THE CASE

16 (Docs. 8, 13) 17 Hendrik Block seeks default judgment against Arsh & Jot LLC, for violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act. (See Docs. 1, 8.) For the reasons set forth below, the motion for default judgment is granted in part. The Court finds default judgment is appropriate for the claim arising under the ADA but declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction and dismisses the claims arising under state law without prejudice. I. Relevant Background Block reports he “is substantially limited in his ability to walk, and must…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.