Block
Block v. Arsh & Jot LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HENDRIK BLOCK, Case No. 1:24-cv-0812 JLT SAB Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING IN PART THE
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
v. GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT,
ARSH & JOT LLC, DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S STATE LAW
CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND
Defendant. DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO
CLOSE THE CASE
16 (Docs. 8, 13) 17 Hendrik Block seeks default judgment against Arsh & Jot LLC, for violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act. (See Docs. 1, 8.) For the reasons set forth below, the motion for default judgment is granted in part. The Court finds default judgment is appropriate for the claim arising under the ADA but declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction and dismisses the claims arising under state law without prejudice. I. Relevant Background Block reports he “is substantially limited in his ability to walk, and must…