Collins

Collins v. Biden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 23, 20241:24-cv-01309California357 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARVIN CHARO COLLINS, ) Case No.: 1:24-cv-01309 JLT EPG ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THE v. ) ACTION WITH PREJUDICE, AND DIRECTING ) THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THIS CASE JOSEPH ROBINETT BIDEN, JR., et al., ) ) (Doc. 8) Defendants. ) )

Marvin Charo Collins alleges violations of the Lanham Act by government officials, including President Biden. (Doc. 1.) Reviewing the complaint, the magistrate judge found “all of Plaintiff’s claims are absolutely meritless….” (Doc. 8 at 6; see also id. at 3-6.) The magistrate judge found “the complaint could not be saved by amendment.” (Id.) Therefore, the magistrate judge recommended “the complaint be dismissed with prejudice and without leave to amend.” (Id.) On November 22, 2024, Plaintiff filed a “Common Law Copyright Notice” and a copy of the Findings and Recommendations with handwritten notations, including an indication that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.