Taylor

Taylor v. Aquarion Asset Management, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 23, 20242:24-cv-00346California354 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KIMBERLY TAYLOR, Case No. 2:24-cv-0346-JAM-JDP Plaintiff, v. ORDER AQUARION ASSET MANAGEMENT,

LLC,

15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff’s motion for entry of default judgment was submitted for decision without oral argument by the magistrate judge on April 23, 2024. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(19) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On November 18, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.