Fletcher
(PC) Webster v. Fletcher
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NATHAN WEBSTER, No. 2:24-cv-1479 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
FLETCHER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a county inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 19, 2024, the court screened the complaint and found that plaintiff adequately stated an excessive force claim against defendant Patterson while his claims against defendant Fletcher were insufficient. ECF No. 10. Plaintiff was given the option of amending the complaint or proceeding immediately on his cognizable claims against defendant Patterson. Id. at 3. He was further advised that if he failed to notify the court how he wanted to proceed, the court would assume that he was choosing to proceed on the complaint as screened and recommend dismissal without prejudice of defendant Fletcher. Id. The time for plaintiff to notify the court as to how he wishes to proceed has now…