Shawn Barth v. Jared Lazano

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 24, 202423-15897California536 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 24 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SHAWN DAMON BARTH, No. 23-15897

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-01874-WBS-DB

v.

MEMORANDUM*

JARED D. LAZANO, Warden; BROWN, Captain; I.S.U LOPEZ; A.W. MEDIA; EUSEBIO MONTEJO, Doctor,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California William B. Shubb, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 17, 2024**

Before: WALLACE, GRABER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Shawn Damon Barth appeals pro se from the district court’s summary

judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violations of the First, Eighth,

and Fourteenth Amendments. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). review de novo. Hutchinson v. U.S., 838 F.2d 390, 392 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.