Raimi Shoaga v. Andrew Nelson , III

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 24, 202423-16002California276 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 24 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAIMI SHOAGA, No. 23-16002

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-01953-DAD-CKD

v.

MEMORANDUM*

ANDREW NELSON III; CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 17, 2024**

Before: WALLACE, GRABER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Raimi Shoaga appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his Title VII action alleging employment discrimination. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s dismissal under Fed.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Wood v. City of San Diego, 678 F.3d 1075, 1080…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.