Raimi Shoaga v. Andrew Nelson , III
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 24, 202423-16002California276 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 24 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RAIMI SHOAGA, No. 23-16002
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-01953-DAD-CKD
v.
MEMORANDUM*
ANDREW NELSON III; CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 17, 2024**
Before: WALLACE, GRABER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
Raimi Shoaga appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing
his Title VII action alleging employment discrimination. We have jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s dismissal under Fed.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Wood v. City of San Diego, 678 F.3d 1075, 1080…