Easton Murray v. Arizona, State Of

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 24 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EASTON MURRAY, No. 23-15791

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:22-cv-00360-RM

and

MEMORANDUM*

CLAUDIUS MURRAY,

Plaintiff,

v.

ARIZONA, STATE OF; PIMA, COUNTY

OF; DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE,

named as Office of the District Attorney;

JOSEPH THOMAS MAZIARZ; AMY

THORSON; BARBARA LaWALL; CHRIS

WARD; LAURA CONOVER,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Rosemary Márquez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 17, 2024**

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: WALLACE, GRABER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Easton Murray appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging federal and state law claims arising out of a

state court…