Michael Jackman v. City of Pocatello

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 24, 202423-35546California257 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 24 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL A. JACKMAN, No. 23-35546

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:21-cv-00379-AKB

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CITY OF POCATELLO; ROGER SCHEI;

KEVIN NIELSEN; JOHN DOES, I-X,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho Amanda K. Brailsford, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 17, 2024**

Before: WALLACE, GRABER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Michael A. Jackman appeals pro se from the district court’s summary

judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging claims arising out of his arrest.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

Because Jackman does not challenge any decision by the district court in his

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). opening brief, including its decision to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.