In Re: Artem Koshkalda v. E. Schoenmann

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 24, 202423-60031California304 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 24 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: ARTEM KOSHKALDA, No. 23-60031

Debtor. BAP No. 23-1022 ______________________________

ARTEM KOSHKALDA, MEMORANDUM*

Appellant,

v.

E. LYNN SCHOENMANN, Chapter

Trustee,

Appellee.

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Corbit, Brand, and Gan, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding

Submitted December 17, 2024**

Before: WALLACE, GRABER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Chapter 7 debtor Artem Koshkalda appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s order

denying him leave to file pleadings under a vexatious litigant order. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo the BAP’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.