Ian Gage v. Midwestern University
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 24, 202423-16078California460 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 24 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
IAN GAGE, No. 23-16078
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-02745-DLR
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MIDWESTERN UNIVERSITY,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Douglas L. Rayes, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 17, 2024**
Before: WALLACE, GRABER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
Ian Gage appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment, on
remand from this court, in his action alleging violations of the Americans with
Disabilities Act (“ADA”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We
review de novo. Nunies v. HIE Holdings, Inc., 908 F.3d 428, 430-31 (9th Cir.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 2018). We vacate and remand.