Ian Gage v. Midwestern University

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 24, 202423-16078California460 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 24 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IAN GAGE, No. 23-16078

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-02745-DLR

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MIDWESTERN UNIVERSITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Douglas L. Rayes, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 17, 2024**

Before: WALLACE, GRABER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Ian Gage appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment, on

remand from this court, in his action alleging violations of the Americans with

Disabilities Act (“ADA”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

review de novo. Nunies v. HIE Holdings, Inc., 908 F.3d 428, 430-31 (9th Cir.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 2018). We vacate and remand.

The district court granted summary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.