Lingenfelter

Lingenfelter v. Kalinina CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 24, 2024D083208California4,989 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rubin, J.

Filed 12/24/24 Lingenfelter v. Kalinina CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL JAMES LINGENFELTER, D083208

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2022- 00022798-CU-DF-CTL) ANASTASIA KALININA et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Robert C. Longstreth, Judge. Affirmed. Menhennet Law and Janine R. Menhennet for Defendants and Appellants. Michael James Lingenfelter, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Defendants Anastasia Kalinina (Kalinina), 4354 Sandy Springs Dr. LLC (Sandy Springs), and 2850 Copeland Road LLC (Copeland Road) (collectively, Defendants) appeal from an order denying their special motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.