Watts

United States v. Watts

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 24, 202423-712California555 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 24 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-695 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:16-cr-00644-PA-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MICHAEL L. WATTS,

Defendant - Appellant.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-712 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:16-cr-00645-PA-1 v.

MICHAEL L. WATTS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 17, 2024**

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: WALLACE, GRABER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated appeals, Michael L. Watts appeals from the district

court’s judgments imposing an aggregate sentence of 96 months following the

revocation of supervised release in two…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.