Rodriguez-Duran

Rodriguez-Duran v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 24, 202423-2074California480 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 24 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ELVIN RODRIGUEZ-DURAN; et al., No. 23-2074 Agency Nos. Petitioners, A216-757-391

A216-637-664

v.

A216-637-674

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 17, 2024**

Before: WALLACE, GRABER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Elvin Rodriguez-Duran, Sofia Alvarado-Alvarado,1 and their son

(“Petitioners”), natives and citizens of El Salvador, petition pro se for review of the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 The Clerk will update petitioners’ names on the docket to “Elvin Rodriguez-Duran” and “Sofia Alvarado-Alvarado,” consistent with the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order. Board of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.