Witt

United States v. Witt

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 24, 202424-1567California377 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 24 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-1567 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 4:16-cr-00257-BLW-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

CODY ALLEN WITT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho B. Lynn Winmill, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 17, 2024**

Before: WALLACE, GRABER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Cody Allen Witt appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges

the 21-month sentence imposed upon the second revocation of his supervised

release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Witt contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to consider

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the 18 U.S.C. § 3553 sentencing factors and adequately explain the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.