Badbear

United States v. Badbear

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 24, 202424-2780California373 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 24 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-2780 D.C. No. 1:17-cr-00127-SPW-1 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MEMORANDUM*

VERNELLE LYNN BADBEAR,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 17, 2024**

Before: WALLACE, GRABER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Vernelle Lynn Badbear appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying

reconsideration of its denial of her third motion for compassionate release, as well

as her fourth motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i).

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing for abuse of discretion,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). see United States v. Wright, 46 F.4th 938, 944…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.