William Kivett v. Flagstar Bank, Fsb

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 24, 202421-15667California201 words

Opinion

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DEC 24 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

WILLIAM KIVETT; et al., No. 21-15667

Plaintiffs-Appellees, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-05131-WHA Northern District of California, v. San Francisco

FLAGSTAR BANK, FSB, ORDER

Defendant-Appellant.

Before: BYBEE and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and BOLTON,* District Judge.

Flagstar Bank’s petition for panel rehearing, filed October 7, 2024, is

GRANTED. The memorandum disposition filed on August 22, 2024, is withdrawn

and submission is vacated pending further order of the court. The court intends to

schedule oral argument on a date to be determined. With the withdrawal of the

memorandum disposition filed on August 22, 2024, Flagstar Bank’s petition for

rehearing en banc is denied as moot.

The court requests simultaneous supplemental briefing by the parties

addressing whether California Civil Code § 2954.8(a) is preempted by the National

Bank Act under the standard and methodology described in Cantero v. Bank of

America, N.A.,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.