1

2

3

4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6 CHRISTINE GRALOW, Case No. CV 23-7238-SSS(E) 7 Plaintiff, 8

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,

9 v. CONCLUSIONS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF

10 CITY OF PALOS VERDES ESTATES, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE

11 ET AL.,

12 Defendants.

13

14 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the Third 15 Amended Complaint, all of the records herein and the attached Report and 16 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has 17 engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and 18 Recommendation to which any objections have been made. The Court accepts 19 and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation. 20

21 IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Third Amended Complaint is dismissed; 22 and (2) Plaintiff is granted leave to file a Fourth Amended Complaint consistent 23 with the Report and Recommendation and this Order. 24 /// 25 /// 26

27 Plaintiff is granted thirty (30) days from the date of this Order within 2 which to file a Fourth Amended Complaint. Any Fourth Amended Complaint 3 || shall be complete in itself and shall not refer in any manner to the prior Complaints. Any exhibits referenced in the Fourth Amended Complaint must 5 || be attached thereto. Any Fourth Amended Complaint may not include a claim 6|| for filing a false police report. Plaintiff may not add defendants without leave of 7\| Court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 21. Failure timely to file a Fourth Amended 8 || Complaint that complies with this Order may result in the dismissal of the action. See Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 642-43 (9th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 909 (2003) (court may dismiss action for failure to follow 11 ]} court order). 12 13 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve forthwith a copy of this Order and the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation on Plaintiff 15 || and on all counsel of record. 16 Dated: December 23, 2024 18 United States District Judge 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28