Perry Bruno v. Dr. Squatch, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20242:24-cv-07798California3,565 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

On November 17, 2022, Plaintiff Perry Bruno filed a putative class action in Los Angeles Superior Court against Defendant, alleging that Defendant labels its products with false and misleading claims that its products are “natural” when, in fact, they contain synthetic ingredients. (Ex. A-1 to Mot., Bruno Compl., Doc. 15-1.) The Complaint alleged violations of California’s False Advertising Act (“FAL”), Cal. Bus & Prof. Code §§ 17500 et seq. and California’s Unfair Business Practices Act (“UCL”), Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200 et seq. (Id. ¶¶ 52–79.) Bruno served his Complaint on Defendant on November 22, 2022. (Ex. 11 to Ex. B of Notice of Removal (“NOR”), Doc. 1-2.) On ______________________________________________________________________________

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:24-cv-07798-JLS-JC Date: December 19, 2024 Title: Perry Bruno et al v. Dr. Squatch, LLC

March 20, 2023, Bruno amended his Complaint to add a claim under California’s Consumer Legal Remedies Act…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.