Tounkara

Tounkara v. Director, Office of Worker's Compensation Programs

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 26, 202423-1368California495 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 26 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FOUSSEINI TOUNKARA, No. 23-1368 Agency No. 22-0047 Petitioner,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKER'S

COMPENSATION

PROGRAMS; GLACIER FISH

COMPANY; SEABRIGHT INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board

Submitted December 26, 2024**

Before: WALLACE, O’SCANNLAIN, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Fousseini Tounkara petitions pro se for review of a decision of the Benefits

Review Board (“BRB”) affirming an administrative law judge’s (“ALJ”)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). modification of a prior disability benefits award to reflect that his entitlement to

disability benefits ceased as of August 6, 2016, pursuant to the Longshore and

Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 901–950. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.