George
George v. Hartman CA6
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 12/26/24 George v. Hartman CA6
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
KOSHY PUTHUKKERIL GEORGE, H050941
(Santa Clara County Respondent, Super. Ct. No. 21CH010234)
v.
ERIC FLOYD HARTMAN,
Appellant.
THE COURT1
Eric Floyd Hartman appeals from the trial court’s grant of Koshy Puthukkeril George’s request to modify the existing civil harassment restraining order protecting George from Hartman. Hartman argues that the trial court had neither personal nor subject matter jurisdiction to rule on the request. He makes this argument based on his contention that George moved from his residence. Hartman fails to make reasoned argument or cite relevant authority to support his theory. Further, we note that the trial court…