Hatch

Hatch v. Cendana CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 26, 2024B327911California5,659 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 12/26/24 Hatch v. Cendana CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

DEBORAH HATCH et al., B327911

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. LC103648) v.

INEE CENDANA,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Shirley K. Watkins, Judge. Affirmed.

Klapach & Klapach, Joseph S. Klapach; Law Offices of Tracey P. Hom, Tracey P. Hom; Stein Law Firm and Jay Stein for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Jeremiah Flores Valdez for Defendant and Respondent.

______________________________ “No one can take advantage of his own wrong.” (Civ. Code, § 3517.) Yet that is exactly what Deborah Hatch (Hatch) attempted to do when she filed this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.