Chand

Chand v. Regan

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 26, 20243:21-cv-07773California6,962 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHARON S. CHAND,

Case No. 21-cv-07773-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR

MICHAEL S. REGAN, SUMMARY JUDGMENT

13 Defendant.

I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Sharon Chand brings a pro se disability discrimination suit against Defendant Michael S. Regan, Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), her former employer. The suit raises five claims for relief: disparate treatment, retaliation, hostile work environment, failure to accommodate, and ADA interference. After two motions to dismiss and two amendments to Chand’s complaint, Defendant now moves for summary judgment on all claims. For the reasons below, the motion is granted as to Chand’s claims of disability discrimination, retaliation, and ADA interference, denied as to the claim of hostile work environment, and denied in part and granted in part as to the claim…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.