Richard Ceja v. Beverly Hills Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 24, 20242:22-cv-05884California2,789 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 2:22-cv-05884-MEMF-AGR RICHARD CEJA, an individual, FINN O’

MCCLAFFERTY, an individual, BRIAN WEIR, an individual, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS [ECF No. 66] Plaintiffs,

v.

15 THE CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS, et al. Defendants.

18 19 Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant City of Beverly Hills. ECF No. 66. The Court deems this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument. See C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. For the reasons stated herein, the Court GRANTS the Motion to Dismiss. 23 24 / / / / / / / / / / / / I. Factual Allegations and Procedural History1 The Court discussed the background of this action in detail in a previous Order. See ECF No. 60. The Court will briefly summarize most of this background and focus only on aspects relevant to the instant Motion. A. Background Factual Allegations …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.