Taylor Thomson v. Persistence Technologies BVI Pte Ltd.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 26, 20242:23-cv-04669California2,903 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 2:23-cv-04669-MEMF-MAR TAYLOR THOMSON,

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING APPLICATION FOR

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

v. [ECF No. 82] 14 PERSISTENCE TECHNOLOGIES BVI PTE LTD.; TUSHAR AGGARWAL; and ASHLEY RICHARDSON, Defendants.

ASHLEY RICHARDSON, Counterclaimant, v.

TAYLOR THOMSON,

22 Counter Defendant. 23

25 26 Before the Court is an Ex Parte Application for a Temporary Restraining Order filed by Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Ashley Richardson. See ECF No. 82. The Court deems this matter appropriate for resolution without oral argument. See C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. For the reasons stated herein, the Court DENIES the Ex Parte Application. I. Background The Court addressed the background of this litigation at length in a previous Order. See ECF No. 76. The Court will only address aspects…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.