Martinez

(PC) Medina v. Martinez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 26, 20241:23-cv-00935California3,052 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ROBERT MEDINA, JR., Case No. 1:23-cv-00935-KES-EPG (PC) Plaintiff,

SCHEDULING ORDER

v. Exhaustion Motions: March 24, 2025 Defendant Identification: January 23, 2025 Motions to Compel: July 23, 2025 GUSTAVO MARTINEZ, et al., Non-expert Discovery: August 25, 2025 Dispositive Motions: September 24, 2025 Defendants.

This Court now sets a schedule for this action through the filing of dispositive motions. I. DISCOVERY PROCEDURES Discovery is now open, and the parties are granted leave to serve discovery requests. 17 Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 1, 16, and 26–36, discovery shall proceed as 18 follows: 19 1. The parties may take the following types of discovery from other parties: 20 a. Interrogatories (an interrogatory is a written question or request for 21 information and “may relate to any matter that may be inquired into under 22 Rule 26(b).” Fed. R. Civ. P. 33(a)(2)); 23 b. Requests for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.